user-avatar
Today is Wednesday
May 23, 2012

Category: Gaming

March 5, 2011

The Silly Setup Of Failure

A trend I tend to see in my travels across the world wide web reading about games and their release is a certain subsection of  geek that’s always piqued my interest. No, I’m not talking about that strange guy who likes to refer to himself in the third person when he posts or that one girl who has to write in pink text every time as it it was breathing. This time, I’m talking about the ones set on ensuring that they are looking for a complete failure when it comes to a game or a show or a movie that is upcoming.

The reason why these folks are so curious to me is because as an optimist, there’s a level of intrigue as to the polar opposite of my outlook on things. What must it be like to be expecting failure all the time, even when it comes to the things that might most likely be a success? For geekery, where there is always something new and interesting around the corner and there’s a high amount of intelligence that suggests it might be decent, it’s even more of a surprise. Sure, there are cynics out there, and there are pessimists, but having a negative outlook on something is different than expecting something to fail. It’s easy to spot these folks too. They make forum threads predicting doom and gloom, blog about how the next best thing isn’t quite as good as sliced bread, and are always quick to insert an oppositional, Eeyore-like shrug into conversations that excitedly talk about what’s coming up.

If I had to take a guess, it would have to be that the people who want to anticipate failure are afraid of the feeling that it gives to them when they see something they like go down the crapper.  Perhaps hurt by having high expectations, a failure-thinker lowers them to the other extreme figuring that when the inevitable success happens, they will be pleasantly surprised.  It’s a sort of defense mechanism against high ideals and immense like for something no matter how popular it is. But why, as a geek, would you allow your self to be disappointed prior to the disappointment having any teeth to it? The thing that I would think is that setting yourself for failure basically means you’re never feeling like something succeeds. You’re denying yourself the anticipation and feeling, and good vibe that can lift a day just by being there. And low expectations that are met are still, in the end, low expectations, no matter how far above the bar they might go.

Not everyone can see a silver lining like me all the time – I can get that and understand it. But I’d also hope to think that not everyone can see just a rain cloud when they look at the sky, either. It’s a sort of grey view of things and a method by which you’re always going to be sad about anything and everything. The elation of success felt when your low standards are met is temporary and only leads to the next thing that you think isn’t going to cut the mustard. It’s just not a good way of thinking. I think that being genuinely excited about something, whether it is a game with great features you like, or a tv show that really seems to speak to you, or a movie that you’ve been waiting to be made is worth feeling a little down if it doesn’t ultimately pan out. At least then, you’d only be temporarily sad, instead of temporarily happy. I’ll take the happy any day.

March 4, 2011

Cheap Update With A Recognizable Voice

I think maybe you anime fans might recognize the voice in this video.

See you, space cowboy…

More Star Wars: The Old Republic Videos

March 3, 2011

MMO Style Points – Why I Like Oohs And Aahs

 

Maybe I’ve watched too many trailers for games lately, but  reading the comments for some of them seems to be like reading the ones for the Oscars. There’s a lot of talk about what impressions are had, what kind of impact it means, and all that. But there’s also a curious amount of commentary related to style, look, and graphical representation, sharply divided into the “oohs and ahhs” camp of melty goodness and the rather dismissive “it’s only a pretty face” faction.

I fall squarely into the oohs and aahs camp, obviously, and not just because I tend to be a fairly excitable person when it comes to trailers and stylistic graphics. I think that MMOs that look good ultimately score points among gamers in general, and that there should be some priority for the look of a game, especially one that is meant to be played over the course of a couple hours. Now, some people may disagree with me, with the obvious argument that gameplay should trump graphics, and that the worst-looking game with good gameplay will have longer legs than one that looks great but lacks substance. I get that, and I somewhat agree with it, too – I mean, you’re talking to someone who has enjoyed and would probably still enjoy a good text-based MUD with a decent community behind it.

But that being said, there’s something to be said about style, and I think as long as people understand that the point of stylistic, visual elements is to give you that eye-filling rush of excitement, it quickly becomes apparent why developers use it in MMOs. More than anything, MMOs are an attempt at creating an immersive world that players can use in order to have fun, escape for a little while from the ills and trials of real life, and most of all, help your own imagination visualize what being in that world is like. I’m all about the limitless nature of the human imagination, but sometimes it does need a little bit of a boost from something graphically pretty and detailed. That’s where all those game trailers, ads, and character creation dialogs with zooms and bells and whistles come from.

I think if more people realized that style is not really a necessary function of an MMO but rather a method by which to get people excited, less of them would be apt to dismiss an MMO as something that looks good but doesn’t play good. Besides, it’s hard to really tell how something actually plays until you get your hands on it. Until then, be happy with the eyeful you can get of a game that not only looks like it has its own distinct look but isn’t afraid to show it off.

 

March 2, 2011

A 3-Month MMO Work In Progress

I check out a lot of other blogs in my spare time and I probably should respond to a few of them a bit more – there’s lots of talented folks out there who write about subjects that I’m interested in, and beyond that, quite a few that I can inject a bit of responsive optimism into. Today I poked into one such post by Keen, who writes that most if not all MMOs post-WoW apparently have only 3 months worth of shelf life and are built to “achieve failure”.

Whoa there, cynical train, stop pulling into the station. The idea that MMOs these days are built, consciously or unconsciously, to fall on their face is a bit of a sad analysis of affairs, is it not? I feel bad for Keen, as it appears he’s fallen into a pattern of creating positive posts about an MMO only to be dashed against the rocks and end up disliking it. I wouldn’t say that MMOs these days are built to fail within a time period of 3 months, per se. Rather, I think that MMO developers in general are finding that making a game such as WoW, or Everquest, or anything else for that matter is a work in progress rather than a finished product.

Players, however, don’t quite follow the same mindset. Some of this may come from the fact that the playerbase is larger, which means that the old school MMO player finds themselves surrounded by folks who were not raised on games like UO and EQ, but rather on things like console games and modern online play, which provide a mostly finished product with additions and bug fixes being the only thing that needed changing. The issue is that the mentality is transferred to MMOs, where finished products are expected of virtual worlds that are always changing and never quite set in stone. When these players crash up against the fact that an MMO is not only persistent but not something that has a closed end to it, they’re not willing to be as forgiving as they good be. The mass migration and practice of MMO tourism is pretty much based in this mentality.

The other fact is that the mentality of a finished product that is able to provide years of entertainment infects old school MMOers like Keen, too. There’s a bit of selective memory in some of us folks who’ve been around for a long time – we don’t really remember the fact that UO took years to fix some core bugs and player-killer issues or that EQ raids sometimes had issues that crippled encounters. We don’t really remember that in FFXI you used to be able to (accidentally or not) run a mob who was chasing you to the end of a zone for some poor adventurer to die to upon entry. We don’t even remember that WoW’s release  had a couple classes that were arguably not fleshed out and a  dungeon system that shouldn’t have, but did have some busted pull issues. We just remember when it was fixed, polished, made easier, or otherwise was made to be more fun, more engaging, and yes – more of a finished feel. That’s the stuff that takes more than 3 months.

I don’t think I’m saying that people should change their playstyle if they like to rush to level cap, prefer to take their time, or yearn for the increased difficulty and dynamic sandboxing that Keen does. You can only really stand in the way of that flood for so long. Nor am I advocating that developers release unfinished or unpolished products that they can use for a quick buck, either. What I am advocating, is a little bit more of a positive outlook and perspective on MMOs that last, persist, and have a community that sticks around for 3 months or more. A sort of idea that MMOs have bugs, have balance issues, have only a limited amount of content based on game design constraints, and most of all, that things can be changed, updated, or worked on. A chance for something like an MMO to evolve and grow with its interested playerbase, that understands and can commit to things being a work in progress and not an immediate failure.

I think if people adopted more of this attitude, both on the player and developer side, that we’d have less MMO “failures” and more MMO successes in the market – or at least a bit more shelf life to today’s MMO market. They say hindsight is 20/20, but I’d like to say that when it comes to foresight, you can only hope to get as good as 80/40, or worse. Why is this? MMOs, as I’ve said, are a work in progress, always persistent, always changing,  and always affected by its players in new and unique ways, whether through innovation, or through bugs and exploits. There’s no real good way to test for the dynamic nature of human player interaction on a large scale. It’s why developers rely on meaningful feedback that isn’t a rant to fix and change things.

If the players were more positive on the long term outlook of a game that inevitably has to be changed and fixed, and the developers were more positive on the right kind of player feedback that can make their game better (even if it undoes the design a little), we’d have happier folks overall, and not ones that have a contentment level lasting 3 months.

March 1, 2011

The Return Of The Dynamic In MMOs

Today marks the launch of RIFT, a new MMO for which I know a couple community folks that are toiling away (be kind to them, they need sleep!). Like any MMO launch, the usual chaos and craziness abound, as well as a chance to try something different from what people have been waiting for or anticipating.

But one thing that I think the RIFT has been doing that has piqued interest for players is a bit of the dynamic. For those not in the know, occasionally there will be short public questing events that happen in random portion of the zone. These involve a rift opening up and a set of stages during which tasks need to be accomplished, usually in the form of killing things. At the end, players get rewards, so they’re encouraged to group up to get the job done. Sometimes, the event is zone wide, and with quest hubs and NPCs under attack, players across the territory are needed to group up together and prevent the invasion.

While this is not completely as such, this is really a return to dynamic events in MMOs. We haven’t really seen anything like it since, well, the time of the MUDs, where GM-controlled characters would roll around during holidays and setup events or give away some rare prizes to a lucky few. The logistics of setting up a dynamic events system have long since escaped developers due to all of the organization and the anticipated issues involved. While RIFT doesn’t return us to the days of yore with GMs that changed environments and spawned monsters, this certainly is a step in the right direction – mostly because people are quick to get bored with doin gthe same grindy thing in a zone. Rift events break that up a bit, and despite teh complaints, are a nice distraction.

More than anything, the dynamic event goes to show how well players work together in an MMO under some kind of pressure or timer. Watching some events fail with little to no coordination and others succeed with clockwork-like execution is a social experiment that I think the developers and players should keep an interested eye on.  After all, MMOs in general are all about how players interact, plan, and react to situations placed in front of them. I’d say that putting a giant black and purple rift above them and spawning some crazy monsters might just give them the test they, and I, want to see in future games.

February 28, 2011

New Geek Toys

Most non-geeks remember getting toys at Christmas as kids and being excited about what they were getting. They’d get up early, try to catch a little bit of Santa if they could, and ultimately end up tearing open a large box that had everything they wanted inside. It’s one of those nostalgic things that sort of persists into your later years when they watch kids of a later generation do the exact same thing.

But for geeks, that feeling never quite fades away with age. Why is that? I think it’s mostly because geek toys sort of don’t know age, or at the very least, evolve with the geek. When I was young, it was Transformers, GIJoes, and toy cars. As I aged it was PDAs, digital cameras, and CD players. Now it’s computers, massive TVs, and video cameras. With every iteration I never really lost the wonderment of cracking open something and seeing the latest and greatest in tech staring back up at me. And even though these too, were things that were outgrown or obsolete (usually within the first two weeks) they were for me a bit of excitement at using and utilizing something new.

For geeks I don’t think it’s just about a toy for toy’s sake. Despite what some people might think about some of the latest devices out there (iPad comes to mind), most geeks are more excited for the fact that they might get use out of their new toys than they are for having the toy itself. A new computer allows for more to be done with regards to projects, businesses, and recreation. A new TV allows for better solution, nicer recording, and some features in HD that make everything seem to pop out a lot better. The list goes on. The practicality of something, the thing that makes anew device useful, is what truly excites and makes a geek go nuts over the best tech toys out there.

But that isn’t to say there isn’t a bit of that child-like idea of having something that no one else has, among geeks with their toys. First generation adopters have always been temporary darlings in the geek community, posting impressions, ideas, thoughts, and unboxing videos galore for others to live vicariously through. The rush of using a new piece of technology sometimes lasts hours and days, as fevered excitement infects others and causes them to potentially jump on the new geek toy bandwagon. I guess in some respects, it’s coming full circle, back to a childhood where the prospect of a toy was sometimes more exciting than the toy itself. Geek tech is no different, and I hope that even among the cynics, that some level of optimism can be preserved for grown up geeks squealing like kids getting their first game console.

February 27, 2011

The Appeal Of A Good Side-Story

I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’ve always been a sucker for a good side-story. Whether it’s in a game or a good TV show, a story that takes a bit of a detour to take a look at something else from another point of view is one that intrigues me. But why is that? Maybe part of it is the fact that the story itself is meant to be optional or a bit less of a priority to the main plot. Normally when a writer does something like this, it’s meant to either flesh out the existing story or provide a nice little break from the main action for a bit.

In the case of the former, I like a good side story because it sometimes helps to augment things with a little bit of context. Heroes and Lost were two series that were notorious for this,  even if they both did take it to an extreme at times. By jumping back and forth through different times and establishing  the how and why of characters and events, you got to understand why in the main plot something happened. In some cases it can make hated characters sympathetic or certain coincidences destined to happen no matter what.

In the case of a latter, taking focus away from the main cast is a good way to show that there’s not just a self-contained bubble of characterization but a world that those characters affect. Babylon 5, Stargate SG-1, and Battlestar Galactica all do this to a certain extent, taking the point of view of seemingly unimportant characters or events and making them have meaning in the context of the fictional world the main cast impacts. In games it is even more obvious and prevalent, as true sidequesting is a detour off the beaten path, or a stop along the way to look. It’s not always something that has to be done, but the incentivized bonuses for doing so become more and more tempting to today’s obsessive completionists.

Some people would argue that side stories and sidequests are a waste of resources, that a rich main story with deep and compelling characters should be the only thing to worry about. But if you really think about it, the stories that you see on the side do just that. They make the main story richer with their different content and the characters themselves become more compelling with a bit of meat behind the bones that writers come up with. While doing a side quest is completely optional and watching side story eps is not essential, people still experience them – if for nothing else to make their own processing of the action more worthwhile. Those tempted to skip such things in the interest of getting to what’s important might consider a side trip to find a little nugget that might just appeal to them, too.

February 26, 2011

Cheap And Cute Update From RIFT

I knew there was a reason I pre-ordered this game…

If anyone’s interested in grouping up for RIFT, I’ve divided my slow-leveling toons between Faeblight (Defiant), Deepstrike (Defiant), and Sunrest (Guardian). Look for Morden.

February 25, 2011

Cheap Updates Involve The Epic Elderly

Sure, it’s a bit on the sluggish side, but no one really complained at how non-epic the Obi-Wan and Vader duel was from Episode IV, right?

February 24, 2011

The Crazy Fun Of Launch Madness

A friend of mine once said that the best part of chaos is being right in the middle of it as it flows around you. Ok, granted, he was a dude who was the type to annoy people in crowds by stopping, but still, the quote has relevance.

Launch of something when it comes to MMOs is a unique experience. I say unique because of the fact that unlike something you might see in the annals of Black Friday or a midnight game or device release, it’s one that is lived entirely online.  The curious part about that is that you still get the same kinds of archetypes you do when you have someone waiting for an actual release at an actual place. These include – the Guy Who Can’t Stop Whining, The Fanboy Who Knows Too Much, The Random Girl With No Interest In The Game, and Frazzled Staffer With No Sleep. The behavior is the same – people standing around talking about what they’re going to do, folks who’ve probably been camping the place since hours beforehand, at least one person who is yelling just a little too loud for someone’s benefit.

But more than that there is anticipation and excitement. An eagerness, if you will, to get your hands on something and experience it. A need to be the first to experience it. And above all, to share that experience with others. Yeah, it’s packed, and its crowded, and there are long waits and not everyone gets what they want on day one. But the fact of the  matter is that you were there when it started, you suffered a little bit, but eventually you got to do what you came for. In MMOs, that holds even more power because of the fact that you’re sharing the experience not just with someone who is local, but with others who are all over the world.

No one can predict these days what will happen in the weeks following the launch of an MMO. Some succeed, some stay afloat, and others sink. But it’s nice to know that at least for a few moments out of the day, the madness of launch and shared excitement is something that no self-respecting geek gamer wants to miss. I hope everyone holds onto the excitement of logging in for as long as they can for their favorite MMO of choice on launchday. In the midst of the inevitable pain of patching, balancing, nerfing, and crashing, it is something worth remembering.

© 2012 Overly Positive All rights reserved - Wallow theme v0.46.4 by ([][]) TwoBeers - Powered by WordPress - Have fun!